H. E. De Meyer

43 papers receiving 358 citations

Peers

H. E. De Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Algebra and Number Theory 62
  • Numerical Analysis 59
  • Spectroscopy 141
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 89
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 225
Replace Jeremy Schiff with:
Jeremy Schiff Israel
Domenico D’Alessandro United States
David R. Masson Canada
Galliano Valent France
Bogdan Mielnik Mexico
Madan Lal Mehta France
Peter Lesky Germany
Stefano Marmi Italy
Boris Tsirelson Israel
W. N. Bailey United Kingdom
H. E. De Meyer relative to Jeremy Schiff Israel Jeremy Schiff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.0×
Jeremy Schiff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. E. De Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. E. De Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. E. De Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. E. De Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. E. De Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. E. De Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. E. De Meyer. The network helps show where H. E. De Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside H. E. De Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. E. De Meyer Line = papers co-authored together H. E. De Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198547
2 198944
3
Asymmetric semilinear copulas
200738
4
On the dominance relation between ordinal sums of conjunctors
200621
5 198021
6 200318
7 197918
8 198018
9 200117
10
Orbital semilinear copulas
200916
11 198716
12 198016
13 198015
14 198115
15 198014
16 198914
17 198512
18 198012
19 198011
20 19839

About H. E. De Meyer

H. E. De Meyer is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Materials Chemistry and Mathematical Physics, having authored 49 papers that have together received 507 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (14 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (13 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (9 papers), Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (5 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (5 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (5 papers), Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (4 papers) and Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (62 citations), Numerical Analysis (59 citations), Spectroscopy (141 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (89 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (225 citations). H. E. De Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Greet Vanden Berghe, Bernard De Baets, G. Vanden Berghe, Veerle Fack, P. Van Isacker, J. Van der Jeugt, Radko Mesiar, J. W. B. Hughes, Susanne Saminger‐Platz and Anum Shafiq. Their work appears in journals such as Kybernetika, Annals of Nuclear Energy, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Journal of Mathematical Physics and SIAM Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact