Gulzar Malik

36 papers receiving 377 citations

Peers

Gulzar Malik
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 60
  • Research and Theory 13
  • General Health Professions 202
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 89
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 16
Replace Joanne Cleary‐Holdforth with:
Joanne Cleary‐Holdforth Ireland
Asma Al Yahyaei Oman
Inger Åse Reierson Norway
Regina María dos Santos Brazil
Francine Girard Canada
Karen Furlong Canada
Jan Emory United States
Monica E. Björkström Sweden
Majeda M. El‐Banna United States
Alvita K. Nathaniel United States
Gulzar Malik relative to Joanne Cleary‐Holdforth Ireland Joanne Cleary‐Holdforth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Joanne Cleary‐Holdforth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gulzar Malik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gulzar Malik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gulzar Malik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gulzar Malik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gulzar Malik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gulzar Malik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gulzar Malik. The network helps show where Gulzar Malik may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gulzar Malik, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gulzar Malik Line = papers co-authored together Gulzar Malik links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201465
2 202048
3 201644
4 201825
5 201622
6 202120
7 202216
8 202115
9 202111
10 201611
11 201610
12 201610
13 201310
14 20189
15 20159
16 20236
17 20225
18 20235
19 20234
20 20234

About Gulzar Malik

Gulzar Malik is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Emergency Medical Services, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 386 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Competency in Health Care (10 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (8 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (6 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (3 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (3 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (2 papers) and Nursing education and management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (60 citations), Research and Theory (13 citations), General Health Professions (202 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (89 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (16 citations). Gulzar Malik has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Indonesia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lisa McKenna, Virginia Plummer, Debra Griffiths, Jennifer Newton, Zainab Akhter, Sonia Reisenhofer, Gabrielle Brand, Monica Peddle, Joy Penman and Yaping Zhong. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education Today, Nursing and Health Sciences, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Nurse Education in Practice and Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact