Guangfa Wang

176 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Guangfa Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 94
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 116
  • Physiology 350
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 350
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 73
Replace Yoshinori Itoh with:
Yoshinori Itoh Japan
Christoph H. Gleiter Germany
Ana Fortuna Portugal
Ying Liu China
Alessandro Mugelli Italy
Qian Cheng China
Giancarlo la Marca Italy
Hiroyuki Suga Japan
Jun Pu China
Guangfa Wang relative to Yoshinori Itoh Japan Yoshinori Itoh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Yoshinori Itoh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Guangfa Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Guangfa Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guangfa Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guangfa Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Guangfa Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guangfa Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guangfa Wang. The network helps show where Guangfa Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Guangfa Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Guangfa Wang Line = papers co-authored together Guangfa Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 186 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016155
2 2009151
3 202084
4 201780
5 200979
6 201977
7 202276
8 201865
9 200963
10 202260
11 201158
12 201047
13 200946
14 201644
15 200743
16 201042
17 201841
18 201040
19 201939
20 201638

About Guangfa Wang

Guangfa Wang is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Oncology and Materials Chemistry, having authored 186 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (17 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (10 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (9 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (9 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (6 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (6 papers), Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases (6 papers) and Tracheal and airway disorders (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (94 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (116 citations), Physiology (350 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (350 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (73 citations). Guangfa Wang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Xincun Dou, Jiajie Zhang, Shaoyu Wu, Jing Ma, Zhenzhen Cai, Jinjun Rao, Shuguang Wu, Jiping Liao, Da Lei and Yushu Li. Their work appears in journals such as Respiration, BMC Pulmonary Medicine, CHEST Journal, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Phytotherapy Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact