Bin Du

67.5k citations
247 papers · 45.0k · 19 hit papers · h-index 55

Impact in

Papers in

Bin Du

229 papers receiving 43.7k citations

Bin Du's Hit Papers

National incidence and mortality of hospitalized sepsis in China 2023 · 109 citations
1090+2+4Years since publication5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k

Peers

Bin Du
Comparison fields: 5 of 201
  • Infectious Diseases 16.6k
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 4.1k
  • Neurology 7.6k
  • Modeling and Simulation 1.7k
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 666
Replace David S.C. Hui with:
David S.C. Hui Hong Kong
Maurizio Cecconi Italy
Yaseen M. Arabi Saudi Arabia
Jiaan Xia China
Xiaoying Gu China
Yeming Wang China
Bin Cao China
Guohui Fan China
Jiuyang Xu China
Ting Yu China
Bin Du relative to David S.C. Hui Hong Kong David S.C. Hui's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
David S.C. Hui · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bin Du

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bin Du's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bin Du with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bin Du more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bin Du

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bin Du. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bin Du. The network helps show where Bin Du may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bin Du, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bin Du Line = papers co-authored together Bin Du links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 247 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China
Hit paper breakdown →
202021629
2
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021
Hit paper breakdown →
20213128
3
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021
Hit paper breakdown →
20211789
4
Association Between Administration of Systemic Corticosteroids and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19
Hit paper breakdown →
20201721
5
Coagulopathy and Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Patients with Covid-19
Hit paper breakdown →
20201714
6
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
Hit paper breakdown →
20201559
7
Intensive care management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): challenges and recommendations
Hit paper breakdown →
20201141
8
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Guidelines on the Management of Critically Ill Adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
Hit paper breakdown →
2020991
9
A living WHO guideline on drugs for covid-19 (2020-2023)
Hit paper breakdown →
2020800
10
Prevalence and Outcomes of Infection Among Patients in Intensive Care Units in 2017
Hit paper breakdown →
2020668
11
Clinical Findings in 111 Cases of Influenza A (H7N9) Virus Infection
Hit paper breakdown →
2013558
12
Evolution of Mortality over Time in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation
Hit paper breakdown →
2013515
13
Critical care crisis and some recommendations during the COVID-19 epidemic in China
Hit paper breakdown →
2020448
14 2010328
15
Executive Summary: Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021
Hit paper breakdown →
2021324
16 2015309
17
Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines on the Management of Adults With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the ICU: First Update
Hit paper breakdown →
2021277
18
Clinical Characteristics of Patients Who Died of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China
Hit paper breakdown →
2020262
19 2014237
20 2020222

About Bin Du

Bin Du is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Nephrology, having authored 247 papers that have together received 45.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (54 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (36 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (20 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (17 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (15 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (11 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (10 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (16.6k citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (4.1k citations), Neurology (7.6k citations), Modeling and Simulation (1.7k citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (666 citations). Bin Du has collaborated with scholars based in China, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Li Weng, Haibo Qiu, Jianfeng Xie, Jinmin Peng, Xiangdong Guan, Jigeeshu Vasishtha Divatia, Zhaohui Tong, Younsuck Koh, Masaji Nishimura and Yaseen M. Arabi. Their work appears in journals such as Intensive Care Medicine, Critical Care, Critical Care Medicine, Journal of Critical Care and Frontiers in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact