Countries where authors publish in Archives of Plastic Surgery
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archives of Plastic Surgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archives of Plastic Surgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archives of Plastic Surgery more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Archives of Plastic Surgery
This network shows the impact of papers published in Archives of Plastic Surgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archives of Plastic Surgery.
About Archives of Plastic Surgery
The 1.8k papers published in Archives of Plastic Surgery in the last decades have received a total of 16.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Archives of Plastic Surgery usually cover Dermatology (242 papers), Surgery (1.0k papers), Rehabilitation (95 papers), Urology (58 papers) and Developmental Biology (21 papers) specifically the topics of Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (396 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (216 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (185 papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (124 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (83 papers), Cleft Lip and Palate Research (81 papers), Facial Trauma and Fracture Management (78 papers) and Body Contouring and Surgery (74 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archives of Plastic Surgery are Kefah Mokbel, Hannah Headon, Dae Hyun Lew, Yu Jin Kim, Jong Woo Choi, Yong Oock Kim, Jeong Min Lee, Won Jai Lee, Dong Won Lee and Yong Chan Bae.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.