Countries where authors publish in Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Behavioral Sciences & the Law. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Behavioral Sciences & the Law with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Behavioral Sciences & the Law more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Behavioral Sciences & the Law
This network shows the impact of papers published in Behavioral Sciences & the Law. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Behavioral Sciences & the Law.
About Behavioral Sciences & the Law
The 1.8k papers published in Behavioral Sciences & the Law in the last decades have received a total of 40.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Behavioral Sciences & the Law usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.1k papers), Pharmacy (92 papers), Social Psychology (374 papers), Health (152 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (768 papers) specifically the topics of Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (726 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (338 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (244 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (244 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (234 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (184 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (110 papers) and Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (106 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Behavioral Sciences & the Law are Tom R. Tyler, James R. P. Ogloff, John F. Edens, Jennifer L. Skeem, Robert D. Hare, J. Reid Meloy, Paul J. Frick, Peter Blanck, Randy Borum and Richard Rogers.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.