Grant Mitchell

13 papers receiving 695 citations

Peers

Grant Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Clinical Biochemistry 170
  • Biochemistry 82
  • Physiology 267
  • Reproductive Medicine 69
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 167
Replace Hiroaki Akai with:
Hiroaki Akai Japan
Nasser Rizk Qatar
Cumhur Bilgi Türkiye
Delphine Martin France
Tessa Mocatta New Zealand
Simon Dunmore United Kingdom
Asuka Hino Japan
Raj Pandian United States
Wiesława Łysiak−Szydłowska Poland
Michiel P. C. Siroen Netherlands
Grant Mitchell relative to Hiroaki Akai Japan Hiroaki Akai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Hiroaki Akai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Grant Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grant Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grant Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grant Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grant Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grant Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grant Mitchell. The network helps show where Grant Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Grant Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Grant Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Grant Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1986347
2 1994122
3 1988118
4 198545
5
The Salford Third Stage Trial. Oxytocin plus ergometrine versus oxytocin alone in the active management of the third stage of labor.
199324
6 199422
7 200615
8 199412
9 197711
10 19939
11 19787
12 19667
13 19934
14 20140

About Grant Mitchell

Grant Mitchell is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, having authored 14 papers that have together received 743 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (5 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (3 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (2 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (2 papers), Biochemical and Molecular Research (2 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (2 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (170 citations), Biochemistry (82 citations), Physiology (267 citations), Reproductive Medicine (69 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (167 citations). Grant Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David G. Harrison, Mark L. Armstrong, Paul Freiman, Donald D. Heistad, W. R. Robertson, S. Muttukrishna, Nigel P. Groome, P. G. Knight, Paul Fowler and France Demaugre. Their work appears in journals such as Human Reproduction, The Journal of Pediatrics, Pediatric Research, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Circulation Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact