Grace Yao

93 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

Grace Yao
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
  • Applied Psychology 141
  • Health 225
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 379
  • Social Psychology 514
  • Rehabilitation 141
Replace Karen Stein with:
Karen Stein United States
Dori E. Rosenberg United States
Larry H. Ludlow United States
Lawrence Lam Australia
Anita M. Hubley Canada
T. Cameron Wild Canada
Donald Sharpe Canada
A. J. Guarino United States
William N. Dudley United States
Karen Thorpe Australia
Grace Yao relative to Karen Stein United States Karen Stein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Karen Stein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Grace Yao

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grace Yao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grace Yao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grace Yao more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grace Yao

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grace Yao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grace Yao. The network helps show where Grace Yao may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Grace Yao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Grace Yao Line = papers co-authored together Grace Yao links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Development and verification of validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version.
2002440
2 1993236
3 2008135
4 2004127
5 2006126
6 200693
7 199891
8 200789
9 201881
10 201271
11 201365
12 201460
13 200559
14 200656
15 201455
16 200653
17 201152
18 200749
19 200448
20
Psychometric evaluation of the Taiwan version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire.
200448

About Grace Yao

Grace Yao is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 101 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (8 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (8 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (6 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (141 citations), Health (225 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (379 citations), Social Psychology (514 citations) and Rehabilitation (141 citations). Grace Yao has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Chia‐Huei Wu, Jung‐Der Wang, Lloyd G. Humphreys, David Lubinski, Ching‐Lin Hsieh, Carol L. Gohm, Anne Henderson, Susanna M. K. Chow, Mei‐Hui Tseng and Wen‐Chung Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Social Indicators Research, Value in Health, Quality of Life Research, Journal of Applied Psychology and British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact