G.M. Lees

1.5k citations
46 papers · 1.2k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

G.M. Lees

45 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

G.M. Lees
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Gastroenterology 321
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 529
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 104
  • Sensory Systems 52
  • Pharmacy 52
Replace Harald Schwörer with:
Harald Schwörer Germany
T Scratcherd United Kingdom
J Tasler Poland
H. J. Lenz United States
P. F. Schmalz United States
K. Uvnäs‐Wallensten Sweden
A. Carl United States
Ulrike Holzer‐Petsche Austria
Olof Nylander Sweden
Patrícia Castelucci Brazil
G.M. Lees relative to Harald Schwörer Germany Harald Schwörer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Harald Schwörer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G.M. Lees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.M. Lees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.M. Lees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.M. Lees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.M. Lees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.M. Lees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.M. Lees. The network helps show where G.M. Lees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G.M. Lees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G.M. Lees Line = papers co-authored together G.M. Lees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1964198
2 198498
3 198496
4 198374
5 198667
6 196866
7 199047
8 199746
9 199643
10 200438
11 198130
12 196430
13 199725
14 197225
15 197422
16 199020
17
Complex correlations between the morphology, electrophysiology and peptide immunohistochemistry of guinea-pig enteric neurones.
199218
18 201517
19 199416
20 196916

About G.M. Lees

G.M. Lees is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Gastroenterology, Surgery and Physiology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (14 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (13 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (5 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (321 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (529 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (104 citations), Sensory Systems (52 citations) and Pharmacy (52 citations). G.M. Lees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include H. W. Kosterlitz, J. P. Hodgkiss, D.I. Wallis, Kirsteen N. Browning, H. Thomas Robertson, John L. Cahill, Gemma Pearson, John B. Furness, Marcello Costa and Joel C. Bornstein. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Pharmacology, Neuroscience, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, The Journal of Physiology and Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact