G.M. Lees

1.5k citations
50 papers · 1.3k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

G.M. Lees

49 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

G.M. Lees
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Gastroenterology 335
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 590
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 92
  • Pharmacy 56
  • Sensory Systems 50
Replace Harald Schwörer with:
Harald Schwörer Germany
T Scratcherd United Kingdom
Olof Nylander Sweden
P. F. Schmalz United States
Jörg Glatzle Germany
K. Uvnäs‐Wallensten Sweden
Piotr Thor Poland
J. Martinson Sweden
J D Reed United Kingdom
B. Greenwood United States
G.M. Lees relative to Harald Schwörer Germany Harald Schwörer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Harald Schwörer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G.M. Lees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.M. Lees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.M. Lees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.M. Lees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.M. Lees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.M. Lees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.M. Lees. The network helps show where G.M. Lees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G.M. Lees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G.M. Lees Line = papers co-authored together G.M. Lees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1964216
2 1984111
3 1984103
4 196883
5 198379
6 198671
7 199048
8 199746
9 199645
10 200444
11 196435
12 197233
13 198133
14 197229
15 199027
16 197426
17 199726
18 201519
19 197019
20
Complex correlations between the morphology, electrophysiology and peptide immunohistochemistry of guinea-pig enteric neurones.
199219

About G.M. Lees

G.M. Lees is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Gastroenterology, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (15 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (15 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (5 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (5 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (335 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (590 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (92 citations), Pharmacy (56 citations) and Sensory Systems (50 citations). G.M. Lees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include H. W. Kosterlitz, D.I. Wallis, J. P. Hodgkiss, John L. Cahill, H. Thomas Robertson, Kirsteen N. Browning, Gemma Pearson, John B. Furness, Joel C. Bornstein and Marcello Costa. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Pharmacology, Neuroscience, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, The Journal of Physiology and Regulatory Peptides.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact