Gemma Pearson

55 papers receiving 853 citations

Peers

Gemma Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Equine 254
  • Gastroenterology 184
  • Small Animals 169
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 313
  • Sensory Systems 56
Replace Roberto Chiocchetti with:
Roberto Chiocchetti Italy
Dania Reiche Germany
Annamaria Grandis Italy
Thomas F. Fletcher United States
D. F. Cottrell United Kingdom
Joelle C. Ingrao Canada
Ioana M. Sonea United States
Sarah Glick Switzerland
Alicia Z. Karas United States
Terrell A. Holliday United States
Gemma Pearson relative to Roberto Chiocchetti Italy Roberto Chiocchetti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Roberto Chiocchetti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gemma Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma Pearson. The network helps show where Gemma Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gemma Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gemma Pearson Line = papers co-authored together Gemma Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983159
2 198667
3 201866
4 200454
5 199443
6 199942
7 201536
8 201729
9 198429
10 198126
11 202126
12 198125
13 198022
14 198121
15
Complex correlations between the morphology, electrophysiology and peptide immunohistochemistry of guinea-pig enteric neurones.
199218
16 202015
17 199514
18 202313
19 200013
20 199712

About Gemma Pearson

Gemma Pearson is a scholar working on Equine, Gastroenterology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Surgery, having authored 59 papers that have together received 906 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Equine Medical Research (23 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (18 papers), Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (9 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (8 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (7 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (6 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (254 citations), Gastroenterology (184 citations), Small Animals (169 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (313 citations) and Sensory Systems (56 citations). Gemma Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ole H. Petersen, Paul Flanagan, Yūji Maruyama, N. P. H. Hudson, I. G. Mayhew, G.M. Lees, Natalie Waran, Joseph S. Davison, Yoshifumi Katayama and Hayley Randle. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Veterinary Research Communications, The Journal of Physiology, Equine Veterinary Journal and Journal of Comparative Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact