Glenn Porter

52 papers receiving 577 citations

Peers

Glenn Porter
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Space and Planetary Science 20
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 12
  • Law 79
  • Marketing 69
  • Safety Research 60
Replace Kembrew McLeod with:
Kembrew McLeod United States
Lisa Parks United States
Daniel Rosenberg United States
Sue McKemmish Australia
Rami K. Isaac Netherlands
Todd Presner United States
Ellen Morris United Kingdom
James Leach France
Bart Simon Canada
Terry Cook Canada
Glenn Porter relative to Kembrew McLeod United States Kembrew McLeod's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Kembrew McLeod · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Glenn Porter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Glenn Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Glenn Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Glenn Porter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Glenn Porter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Glenn Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Glenn Porter. The network helps show where Glenn Porter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Glenn Porter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Glenn Porter Line = papers co-authored together Glenn Porter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197386
2 197273
3 200072
4
Law's Looking Glass: Expert Identification Evidence Derived from Photographic and Video Images
200954
5 201640
6
How to cross-examine forensic scientists: a guide for lawyers
201424
7
The Rise of Big Business, 1860-1910
197320
8 200819
9 200719
10 201118
11 201217
12 201217
13 200817
14 198116
15 200815
16 201014
17 201214
18 201012
19 199412
20 201911

About Glenn Porter

Glenn Porter is a scholar working on Law, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Safety Research, Archeology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 64 papers that have together received 676 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Law in Society and Culture (6 papers), Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (6 papers), Digital Imaging in Medicine (5 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (4 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (4 papers), Digital Media Forensic Detection (4 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (3 papers) and American History and Culture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (20 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (12 citations), Law (79 citations), Marketing (69 citations) and Safety Research (60 citations). Glenn Porter has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Harold C. Livesay, Robert E. Gallman, Harold D. Woodman, Richard I. Kemp, Douglass C. North, Michael Bell, Gary Edmond, Michael Kennedy, David Hamer and Craig Vogel. Their work appears in journals such as The Business History Review, Forensic Science International, Journal of American History, The American Historical Review and Journal of Forensic Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact