David White

7.1k citations
167 papers · 5.0k · h-index 37

Impact in

Papers in

David White

159 papers receiving 4.5k citations

Peers

David White
Comparison fields: 5 of 196
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.6k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.3k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1.8k
  • Dermatology 491
  • Social Psychology 523
Replace Mark W. Becker with:
Mark W. Becker United States
Panayiotis Georgiou United States
Jia Li China
Mark A. Pitt United States
Peter Hampson United Kingdom
Richard J. Morris United States
Kathleen N. Moore United States
David A. Gutman United States
Gregory Francis United States
Kerby Shedden United States
David White relative to Mark W. Becker United States Mark W. Becker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.3×
Mark W. Becker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David White

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David White more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David White

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David White. The network helps show where David White may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David White, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David White Line = papers co-authored together David White links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 167 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011460
2 2010439
3 2018264
4 2005243
5 2014232
6 2015139
7 1989109
8 1971107
9 201593
10 197790
11 198481
12 201175
13 201975
14 197375
15
The Alchemy of Growth: Practical Insights for Building the Enduring Enterprise
199973
16 201968
17 201768
18 198568
19 201367
20 201461

About David White

David White is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Molecular Biology and Surgery, having authored 167 papers that have together received 5.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (56 papers), Face recognition and analysis (41 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (28 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (11 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (11 papers), Vascular Malformations and Hemangiomas (10 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (10 papers) and Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (2.6k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.3k citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (1.8k citations), Dermatology (491 citations) and Social Psychology (523 citations). David White has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include A. Mike Burton, Rob Jenkins, Richard I. Kemp, Morton R. Maser, Allan McNeill, David B. Apfelberg, Alice Towler, Peter Hancock, J. D. Dunitz and James D. Dunn. Their work appears in journals such as Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, Royal Society Open Science, PLoS ONE, Annals of Plastic Surgery and Cognitive Research Principles and Implications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact