Daniel Rosenberg

20 papers receiving 201 citations

Peers

Daniel Rosenberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Anthropology 41
  • History and Philosophy of Science 18
  • General Arts and Humanities 4
  • Geography, Planning and Development 17
  • Literature and Literary Theory 33
Replace Joel Snyder with:
Joel Snyder United States
Nancy L. Green United States
Laurence Raw Türkiye
Thomas Y. Levin United States
Jeffrey T. Schnapp United States
Celia Applegate United States
Jeremy Packer United States
Richard Grusin United States
Kelly Gates United States
Henry Lowood United States
Daniel Rosenberg relative to Joel Snyder United States Joel Snyder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Joel Snyder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Rosenberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Rosenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Rosenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Rosenberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Rosenberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Rosenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Rosenberg. The network helps show where Daniel Rosenberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Rosenberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Rosenberg Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Rosenberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Cartographies of Time: A History of the Timeline
201094
2 200359
3 198249
4 198916
5 200714
6 20217
7 19956
8 20185
9
Racism, dissent, and Asian Americans from 1850 to the present : a documentary history
19935
10 20033
11 20152
12 20112
13 20162
14 20031
15 20201
16 20161
17 20031
18 20211
19 20161
20 19731

About Daniel Rosenberg

Daniel Rosenberg is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, History, Anthropology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Race, History, and American Society (4 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Political Theory and Influence (2 papers), Asian American and Pacific Histories (2 papers), European Political History Analysis (2 papers), Space Exploration and Technology (1 paper), Multimodal Machine Learning Applications (1 paper) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (41 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (18 citations), General Arts and Humanities (4 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (17 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (33 citations). Daniel Rosenberg has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Bruce Nelson, Philip S. Foner, Roi Reichart, Amir Feder, Itai Gat, Duncan Simpson, Thomas Wagner and Bruce Nelson. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie / Russian Sociological Review, Labour / Le Travail, Art Journal and Eighteenth-Century Life.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact