David Hamer
Impact in
- Law top 2%
- Jury Decision Making Processes
- Criminal Law and Evidence
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations
Papers in
- Law 30
- Criminal Law and Evidence 20
- Jury Decision Making Processes 16
- Legal principles and applications 8
- Law in Society and Culture 5
- Co-authors
- Gary Edmond (8 shared papers)Mark Naidis (1 shared paper)Stephen Koss (1 shared paper)Mehera San Roque (4 shared papers)Emma Cunliffe (3 shared papers)Richard I. Kemp (3 shared papers)Glenn Porter (3 shared papers)Mary Peter Mack (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (4 papers)Current Issues in Criminal Justice (3 papers)Modern Law Review (3 papers)Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (2 papers)Law Probability and Risk (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
David Hamer
34 papers receiving 208 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Law 93
- Pharmacy 14
- Family Practice 5
- History 27
- Public Administration 8
Countries citing papers authored by David Hamer
This map shows the geographic impact of David Hamer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Hamer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Hamer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Hamer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Hamer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Hamer. The network helps show where David Hamer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Hamer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 40 | |
| 2 | How to cross-examine forensic scientists: a guide for lawyers | 2014 | 24 |
| 3 | 1978 | 18 | |
| 4 | 1970 | 17 | |
| 5 | 1973 | 16 | |
| 6 | 1997 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 12 | |
| 11 | Probabilistic standards of proof, their complements and the errors that are expected to flow from them | 2004 | 12 |
| 12 | Wrongful convictions, appeals, and the finality principle: The need for a criminal cases review commission | 2014 | 10 |
| 13 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1969 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 18 | The civil standard of proof uncertainty: probability, belief and justice | 1994 | 5 |
| 19 | The Significant Probative Value of Tendency Evidence | 2018 | 4 |
| 20 | 2014 | 4 |
About David Hamer
David Hamer is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Pharmacy, having authored 52 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Law and Evidence (20 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (16 papers), Legal principles and applications (8 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (6 papers), Law in Society and Culture (5 papers), Australian History and Society (5 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (4 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (93 citations), Pharmacy (14 citations), Family Practice (5 citations), History (27 citations) and Public Administration (8 citations). David Hamer has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gary Edmond, Mark Naidis, Stephen Koss, Mehera San Roque, Emma Cunliffe, Richard I. Kemp, Glenn Porter, Mary Peter Mack, Jason M. Tangen and Steven Conn. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, Modern Law Review, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies and Law Probability and Risk.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.