Gilda E. Ennis

830 citations
28 papers · 512 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Gilda E. Ennis

23 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

Gilda E. Ennis
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 114
  • General Decision Sciences 48
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 72
  • Biological Psychiatry 30
  • Applied Psychology 32
Replace Anna McCarrey with:
Anna McCarrey United States
Kendra Leigh Seaman United States
H DAVIS United States
Cynthia Adams United States
Christopher T. Smith United States
Jessica A. Cooper United States
T Mell Germany
Zhiwei Zheng China
Carina Fernandes Portugal
Brittney Schirda United States
Gilda E. Ennis relative to Anna McCarrey United States Anna McCarrey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Anna McCarrey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gilda E. Ennis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gilda E. Ennis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gilda E. Ennis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gilda E. Ennis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gilda E. Ennis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gilda E. Ennis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gilda E. Ennis. The network helps show where Gilda E. Ennis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gilda E. Ennis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gilda E. Ennis Line = papers co-authored together Gilda E. Ennis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016109
2 201398
3 201158
4 201242
5 201240
6 201529
7 201626
8 201421
9 202017
10 198115
11 202314
12 20217
13 20236
14 20186
15 20246
16 20215
17 20255
18 20213
19 20221
20 20231

About Gilda E. Ennis

Gilda E. Ennis is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 28 papers that have together received 512 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (7 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (4 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers), Neurological Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (114 citations), General Decision Sciences (48 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (72 citations), Biological Psychiatry (30 citations) and Applied Psychology (32 citations). Gilda E. Ennis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Thomas M. Hess, Brian T. Smith, Scott D. Moffat, Tara L. Queen, Richard O’Brien, Yang An, Susan M. Resnick, Luigi Ferrucci, Christopher Hertzog and Shevaun D. Neupert. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, The Journals of Gerontology Series B, Psychology and Aging, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease and Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact