Anna McCarrey
Impact in
-
- Aging and Gerontology Research
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 10%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
Papers in
-
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 3
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 1
-
- Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research 1
- Co-authors
- Susan M. Resnick (4 shared papers)Luigi Ferrucci (2 shared papers)Yang An (2 shared papers)Melissa Kitner‐Triolo (1 shared paper)Julie D. Henry (2 shared papers)Fiona Summers (1 shared paper)Clare L. Scott (1 shared paper)Louise H. Phillips (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of Clinical Psychology (1 paper)Journal of Neuroscience (1 paper)Hormones and Behavior (1 paper)Psychology and Aging (1 paper)The International Journal of Aging and Human Development (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Anna McCarrey
8 papers receiving 549 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 60
- Behavioral Neuroscience 44
- Psychiatry and Mental health 163
- Biological Psychiatry 21
- General Decision Sciences 13
Countries citing papers authored by Anna McCarrey
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna McCarrey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna McCarrey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna McCarrey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna McCarrey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna McCarrey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna McCarrey. The network helps show where Anna McCarrey may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Anna McCarrey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 320 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 73 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 49 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 13 |
About Anna McCarrey
Anna McCarrey is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Decision Sciences and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 554 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (1 paper), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper), Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (1 paper) and Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (60 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (44 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (163 citations), Biological Psychiatry (21 citations) and General Decision Sciences (13 citations). Anna McCarrey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Susan M. Resnick, Luigi Ferrucci, Yang An, Melissa Kitner‐Triolo, Julie D. Henry, Fiona Summers, Clare L. Scott, Louise H. Phillips, Jeehoon Kim and Tara L. Stewart. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Clinical Psychology, Journal of Neuroscience, Hormones and Behavior, Psychology and Aging and The International Journal of Aging and Human Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.