Anna McCarrey

8 papers receiving 578 citations

Peers

Anna McCarrey
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 40
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 44
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 136
  • General Decision Sciences 13
  • Biological Psychiatry 14
Replace Linda Bäckman with:
Linda Bäckman Sweden
R. Levy United States
Prathiba Shammi Canada
Teresa Costa Castanho Portugal
Peter M. Aupperle United States
Liliana Amorim Portugal
Matthew Paradise Australia
Emilie T. Reas United States
Chantal Meslin Australia
Roos C. van der Mast Netherlands
Anna McCarrey relative to Linda Bäckman Sweden Linda Bäckman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Linda Bäckman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna McCarrey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna McCarrey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna McCarrey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna McCarrey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna McCarrey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna McCarrey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna McCarrey. The network helps show where Anna McCarrey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Anna McCarrey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna McCarrey Line = papers co-authored together Anna McCarrey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2016337
2 201580
3 200849
4 201435
5 202033
6 201624
7 201816
8 201214

About Anna McCarrey

Anna McCarrey is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Automotive Engineering, having authored 8 papers that have together received 588 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper), Estrogen and related hormone effects (1 paper), Face Recognition and Perception (1 paper), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (1 paper), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (1 paper) and Aging and Gerontology Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (40 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (44 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (136 citations), General Decision Sciences (13 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (14 citations). Anna McCarrey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Susan M. Resnick, Yang An, Luigi Ferrucci, Melissa Kitner‐Triolo, Julie D. Henry, Clare L. Scott, Fiona Summers, Jeehoon Kim, Louise H. Phillips and Tara L. Stewart. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, Neurobiology of Aging, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, Hormones and Behavior and Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact