George E. Barnes

797 citations
16 papers · 680 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

George E. Barnes

15 papers receiving 627 citations

Peers

George E. Barnes
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Ophthalmology 128
  • Emergency Medicine 54
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 132
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 164
  • Nephrology 26
Replace Schrier Rw with:
Schrier Rw United States
P.‐O. Barr Sweden
Sheldon S. Waldstein United States
N. Mayer Austria
Dwight Davis United States
J. Ross Milley United States
G. Blaise Canada
Alphons J.H.M. Houben Netherlands
J Rex Canada
Floris Vanmolkot Netherlands
George E. Barnes relative to Schrier Rw United States Schrier Rw's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Schrier Rw · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George E. Barnes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George E. Barnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George E. Barnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George E. Barnes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George E. Barnes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George E. Barnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George E. Barnes. The network helps show where George E. Barnes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside George E. Barnes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George E. Barnes Line = papers co-authored together George E. Barnes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1985177
2
Nitric oxide and choroidal blood flow regulation.
1995115
3
Local choroidal blood flow in the cat by laser Doppler flowmetry.
199495
4 197971
5 200560
6 197338
7 200832
8 197922
9 197418
10 198316
11 197913
12 197811
13 19728
14 19753
15 19831
16 20180

About George E. Barnes

George E. Barnes is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Nephrology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 680 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (4 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2 papers), Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity (2 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (1 paper) and Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (128 citations), Emergency Medicine (54 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (132 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (164 citations) and Nephrology (26 citations). George E. Barnes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Harris J. Granger, E. E. Smith, Charles E. Riva, Stephen D. Cranstoun, Glen A. Laine, Richard A. Stone, William F. Holt, Lawrence D. Horwitz, V. S. Bishop and V. S. Bishop. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physiology, American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Age and Ageing and Cardiovascular Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact