Cardiovascular Research

11.4k papers and 530.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 11.4k papers published in Cardiovascular Research in the last decades have received a total of 530.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Cardiovascular Research usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (6.2k papers), Molecular Biology (4.2k papers) and Surgery (1.6k papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2.4k papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (1.4k papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (1.1k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cardiovascular Research are Nikolaos G. Frangogiannis, Derek J. Hausenloy, Derek M. Yellon, Antti Saraste, Rainer Schulz, Georg Kojda, Maurits A. Allessie, William C. Stanley, Andrew P. Halestrap and Stanley Nattel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cardiovascular Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cardiovascular Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cardiovascular Research.

Countries where authors publish in Cardiovascular Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cardiovascular Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cardiovascular Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cardiovascular Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025