Geoff King

50 papers receiving 659 citations

Peers

Geoff King
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Animal Science and Zoology 246
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 56
  • Marketing 89
  • Literature and Literary Theory 83
  • Small Animals 46
Replace Dawn Birch with:
Dawn Birch Australia
Francisco García García Spain
Rui Gaspar Portugal
Isaac Cheah Australia
Sylwia Żakowska‐Biemans Poland
Magnus Ljung Sweden
Samo Bobek Slovenia
Michael Öllinger United States
Harri Luomala Finland
Andrzej Szymkowiak Poland
Geoff King relative to Dawn Birch Australia Dawn Birch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×28×
Dawn Birch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Geoff King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Geoff King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoff King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoff King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Geoff King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoff King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoff King. The network helps show where Geoff King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Geoff King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Geoff King Line = papers co-authored together Geoff King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013161
2
Tomb Raiders and Space Invaders: Videogame Forms and Contexts
200577
3 200664
4 196961
5 200545
6
New Hollywood Cinema: An Introduction
200242
7
Science Fiction Cinema: From Outerspace to Cyberspace
200033
8 196831
9
American Independent Cinema : indie, indiewood and beyond
201230
10 197127
11 196824
12 196817
13 196716
14 197014
15 196713
16 196413
17
Effect of carcass grades and fatness on tenderness of meat from steers of known history.
195812
18 196911
19 195611
20 201310

About Geoff King

Geoff King is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Animal Science and Zoology, Genetics, Sociology and Political Science and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 57 papers that have together received 824 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema and Media Studies (17 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (14 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (11 papers), Digital Games and Media (8 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (3 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (3 papers) and Artificial Intelligence in Games (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (246 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (56 citations), Marketing (89 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (83 citations) and Small Animals (46 citations). Geoff King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tanya Krzywinska, Z. L. CARPENTER, Jayne Cox, Sara Giorgi, Gary C. Smith, O. D. Butler, H. C. Abraham, Claire Molloy, J. O. REAGAN and Maurice Shelton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Journal of Food Science, New Review of Film and Television Studies, Resources Conservation and Recycling and Musicology Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact