Musicology Australia

265 papers and 990 indexed citations i.

About

The 265 papers published in Musicology Australia in the last decades have received a total of 990 indexed citations. Papers published in Musicology Australia usually cover Music (174 papers), Sociology and Political Science (55 papers) and Anthropology (36 papers) specifically the topics of Diverse Musicological Studies (101 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (83 papers) and Music History and Culture (61 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Musicology Australia are Patricia Shaw, Helen Payne, Margaret J. Kartomi, Michael Francis Hannan, Ian Cross, Myfany Turpin, Linda Barwick, Michael Kassler, Clint Bracknell and Peter Dunbar‐Hall.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Musicology Australia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Musicology Australia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Musicology Australia.

Countries where authors publish in Musicology Australia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Musicology Australia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Musicology Australia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Musicology Australia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025