Michael Öllinger

2.4k citations
79 papers · 1.4k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Öllinger

70 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Michael Öllinger
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 486
  • General Decision Sciences 66
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 413
  • Food Science 213
  • General Psychology 12
Replace Maya U. Shankar with:
Maya U. Shankar United States
Ernest Baskin United States
Juliette Richetin Italy
Jacob Lund Orquin Denmark
Sydney Scott United States
Patricia A. Lynch United States
David L. Dickinson United States
Ilona E. de Hooge Netherlands
Sara B. Nerlove United States
Luigi Leone Italy
Michael Öllinger relative to Maya U. Shankar United States Maya U. Shankar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
Maya U. Shankar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Öllinger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Öllinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Öllinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Öllinger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Öllinger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Öllinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Öllinger. The network helps show where Michael Öllinger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Öllinger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Öllinger Line = papers co-authored together Michael Öllinger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008106
2 201295
3 201384
4 201381
5 201663
6 201261
7 199759
8 200550
9 200048
10 199647
11 201646
12 200836
13 200633
14 201532
15
Die Methode des lauten Denkens
200627
16 199427
17 199825
18 201824
19 201923
20 201519

About Michael Öllinger

Michael Öllinger is a scholar working on Food Science, Economics and Econometrics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (20 papers), Food Safety and Hygiene (20 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (18 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (13 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (13 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (9 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (7 papers) and Firm Innovation and Growth (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (486 citations), General Decision Sciences (66 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (413 citations), Food Science (213 citations) and General Psychology (12 citations). Michael Öllinger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Günther Knoblich, Gary W. Jones, Amory H. Danek, James M. MacDonald, Benedikt Grothe, Tanya Roberts, Jean C. Buzby, Jorge Fernandez‐Cornejo, Jennifer Wiley and Eörs Szathmáry. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Frontiers in Psychology, Agribusiness, Psychological Research and Food Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact