Genevieve Napper

598 citations
29 papers · 482 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Genevieve Napper

28 papers receiving 471 citations

Peers

Genevieve Napper
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Ophthalmology 231
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 158
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 120
  • Epidemiology 140
  • Molecular Biology 168
Replace Rand Spencer with:
Rand Spencer United States
Marlene Fishman United States
Paula Yuri Sacai Brazil
J-M Hwang South Korea
Peter Herse Australia
Victoria Yang United States
Eva Burkhardt Germany
C. Ellis Wisely United States
Sayantan Biswas India
Katie Williams United Kingdom
Genevieve Napper relative to Rand Spencer United States Rand Spencer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Rand Spencer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Genevieve Napper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Genevieve Napper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Genevieve Napper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Genevieve Napper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Genevieve Napper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Genevieve Napper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Genevieve Napper. The network helps show where Genevieve Napper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Genevieve Napper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Genevieve Napper Line = papers co-authored together Genevieve Napper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199572
2 199954
3 199750
4 200141
5 199938
6 199638
7 200134
8 201419
9 199917
10 201717
11 200712
12 201412
13 200212
14 200110
15 201510
16 20099
17 20058
18 20066
19 20045
20 20194

About Genevieve Napper

Genevieve Napper is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Epidemiology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (9 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (5 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers) and Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (231 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (158 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (120 citations), Epidemiology (140 citations) and Molecular Biology (168 citations). Genevieve Napper has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Kalloniatis, Michael J. Pianta, James S. Wolffsohn, Algis J. Vingrys, Noel A. Brennan, Patricia M Kiely, Carol Lakkis, Sharon A Bentley, Frank Eperjesi and A. Jonathan Jackson. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical and Experimental Optometry, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Visual Neuroscience, Vision Research and The Journal of Comparative Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact