Genevieve Napper

28 papers receiving 489 citations

Peers

Genevieve Napper
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Ophthalmology 156
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 122
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 104
  • Epidemiology 139
  • Molecular Biology 155
Replace А. А. Шпак with:
А. А. Шпак Russia
Motoaki Yoshida Japan
Claudio Cedrone Italy
Sayantan Biswas India
Marlene Fishman United States
P Nemet Israel
Jonathan Yeoh Australia
Paula Yuri Sacai Brazil
Daniel Snydacker
Peter Herse Australia
Genevieve Napper relative to А. А. Шпак Russia А. А. Шпак's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
А. А. Шпак · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Genevieve Napper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Genevieve Napper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Genevieve Napper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Genevieve Napper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Genevieve Napper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Genevieve Napper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Genevieve Napper. The network helps show where Genevieve Napper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Genevieve Napper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Genevieve Napper Line = papers co-authored together Genevieve Napper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199580
2 199957
3 199753
4 200143
5 199639
6 199938
7 200134
8 199919
9 201419
10 201717
11 200713
12 200212
13 201412
14 200111
15 201511
16 20099
17 20058
18 20066
19 20195
20 20045

About Genevieve Napper

Genevieve Napper is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 29 papers that have together received 507 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (6 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (5 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (4 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers) and Corneal Surgery and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (156 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (122 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (104 citations), Epidemiology (139 citations) and Molecular Biology (155 citations). Genevieve Napper has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Kalloniatis, Michael J. Pianta, James S. Wolffsohn, Noel A. Brennan, Algis J. Vingrys, Patricia M Kiely, Carol Lakkis, Sharon A Bentley, Frank Eperjesi and Julie Albietz. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical and Experimental Optometry, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Visual Neuroscience, Vision Research and The Journal of Comparative Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact