Daniel Snydacker

801 citations
30 papers · 669 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Journals
American Journal of Ophthalmology (21 papers)The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (1 paper)Archives of Ophthalmology (1 paper)PubMed (3 papers)A M A Archives of Ophthalmology (1 paper)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Daniel Snydacker

25 papers receiving 573 citations

Peers

Daniel Snydacker
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Ophthalmology 267
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 138
  • Epidemiology 149
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 65
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 72
Replace William M. Lyle with:
William M. Lyle Canada
FRANCIS HEED ADLER United States
David R. Neima Canada
Elfriede Aulhorn Germany
James E. Jan Canada
Robert A. Moses United States
H. Abe Japan
Murray A. Wolkstein United States
L Cerulli Italy
Peter Schilder United States
Daniel Snydacker relative to William M. Lyle Canada William M. Lyle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
William M. Lyle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Snydacker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Snydacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Snydacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Snydacker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Snydacker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Snydacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Snydacker. The network helps show where Daniel Snydacker may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981357
2 199094
3
THE NORMAL OPTIC DISC. OPHTHALMOSCOPIC AND PHOTOGRAPHIC STUDIES.
196446
4 196944
5 196426
6 197120
7 196813
8
The relation of the volume of the crystalline lens to the depth of the anterior chamber.
195610
9 197410
10 19798
11 19547
12 19536
13 19825
14 19723
15 19673
16 19813
17 19932
18 19632
19 19712
20
The Remarkable Career of Martin Howard, Esq.
19881

About Daniel Snydacker

Daniel Snydacker is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, History, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Anatomy and Museology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 669 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (5 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper), Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation (1 paper) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (267 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (138 citations), Epidemiology (149 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (65 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (72 citations). Daniel Snydacker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Ophthalmology, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Archives of Ophthalmology, PubMed and A M A Archives of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact