Gena Lapointe
Impact in
-
- Immune Response and Inflammation
- Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
- T-cell and B-cell Immunology
- Immune cells in cancer
- Immune Cell Function and Interaction
- Immunology and Allergy top 10%
- Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
Papers in
-
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 2
- Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 1
-
- Quinazolinone synthesis and applications 2
- Co-authors
- Patricia Tekamp-Olson (2 shared papers)C Gallegos (2 shared papers)Paul Feucht (2 shared papers)M. Elizabeth Hammond (1 shared paper)Martin Giedlin (1 shared paper)Guy T. Mullenbach (1 shared paper)Hamid Khoja (1 shared paper)Sylvia Ma (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters (2 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (1 paper)Journal of Neurochemistry (1 paper)The Journal of Immunology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Gena Lapointe
5 papers receiving 407 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Immunology 185
- Immunology and Allergy 44
- Oncology 134
- Microbiology 12
- Virology 8
Countries citing papers authored by Gena Lapointe
This map shows the geographic impact of Gena Lapointe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gena Lapointe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gena Lapointe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gena Lapointe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gena Lapointe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gena Lapointe. The network helps show where Gena Lapointe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gena Lapointe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 304 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 60 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 40 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 11 |
About Gena Lapointe
Gena Lapointe is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Immunology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 5 papers that have together received 429 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quinazolinone synthesis and applications (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (1 paper), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (1 paper), Nerve injury and regeneration (1 paper), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (1 paper) and T-cell and B-cell Immunology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology (185 citations), Immunology and Allergy (44 citations), Oncology (134 citations), Microbiology (12 citations) and Virology (8 citations). Gena Lapointe has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Patricia Tekamp-Olson, C Gallegos, Paul Feucht, M. Elizabeth Hammond, Martin Giedlin, Guy T. Mullenbach, Hamid Khoja, Sylvia Ma, Jayesh Vora and Michael A. Siani. Their work appears in journals such as Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Neurochemistry and The Journal of Immunology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.