Gemma Wilson

1.3k citations
69 papers · 717 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Gemma Wilson

65 papers receiving 697 citations

Peers

Gemma Wilson
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 24
  • Clinical Psychology 195
  • Demography 102
  • Health 46
  • General Health Professions 133
Replace Beth Mastel‐Smith with:
Beth Mastel‐Smith United States
Elena Fiabane Italy
Shannon Freeman Canada
Bernadette Willemse Netherlands
Amy Restorick Roberts United States
Julie Erickson United States
Sharon Moore Canada
Iris A. Parham United States
Ole Røgeberg Norway
Othelia EunKyoung Lee United States
Gemma Wilson relative to Beth Mastel‐Smith United States Beth Mastel‐Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Beth Mastel‐Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gemma Wilson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma Wilson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma Wilson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma Wilson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma Wilson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma Wilson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma Wilson. The network helps show where Gemma Wilson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gemma Wilson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gemma Wilson Line = papers co-authored together Gemma Wilson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201893
2 201883
3 202170
4
General Practitioners' attitudes to patients' use of wearable technology
201927
5 202227
6 201923
7 202221
8 202018
9 201618
10 201818
11 201817
12 201916
13 201014
14 201714
15 202214
16 202014
17 202213
18 201212
19 202411
20 202210

About Gemma Wilson

Gemma Wilson is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Demography, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 69 papers that have together received 717 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (9 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (8 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (6 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (4 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (4 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (24 citations), Clinical Psychology (195 citations), Demography (102 citations), Health (46 citations) and General Health Professions (133 citations). Gemma Wilson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Matthew D. Kiernan, Michael A. Hill, Katherine Swainston, Deborah Morgan, Santosh Vijaykumar, Derek Farrell, Ian Barron, Alison Steven, Denis Martin and Philip Hodgson. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Sexually Transmitted Infections, Occupational Medicine, Digital Health and Journal of Loss and Trauma.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact