Gavin Oxburgh

902 citations
39 papers · 576 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Gavin Oxburgh

35 papers receiving 560 citations

Peers

Gavin Oxburgh
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Social Psychology 343
  • Clinical Psychology 200
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 171
  • Gender Studies 74
  • General Health Professions 106
Replace Amy‐May Leach with:
Amy‐May Leach Canada
Fadia M. Narchet United States
Melissa B. Russano United States
Erik Mac Giolla Sweden
Allison Abbe United States
Ann E. Tobey United States
Julian Boon United Kingdom
Jules Holroyd United Kingdom
Juliëtte Schaafsma Netherlands
Marcin Bukowski Poland
Gavin Oxburgh relative to Amy‐May Leach Canada Amy‐May Leach's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Amy‐May Leach · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gavin Oxburgh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gavin Oxburgh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gavin Oxburgh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gavin Oxburgh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gavin Oxburgh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gavin Oxburgh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gavin Oxburgh. The network helps show where Gavin Oxburgh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gavin Oxburgh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gavin Oxburgh Line = papers co-authored together Gavin Oxburgh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010115
2 202077
3 201156
4 201056
5 201141
6 202228
7 200627
8 201524
9 201420
10 201319
11 201117
12 202113
13 202011
14 202210
15 202010
16 20079
17 20117
18 20215
19 20175
20 20214

About Gavin Oxburgh

Gavin Oxburgh is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Political Science and International Relations, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 576 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (24 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (8 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (8 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (7 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (7 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (5 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (3 papers) and Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (343 citations), Clinical Psychology (200 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (171 citations), Gender Studies (74 citations) and General Health Professions (106 citations). Gavin Oxburgh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include James Ost, T. Myklebust, Tim Grant, Julie Cherryman, Coral J. Dando, Fiona Gabbert, Lorraine Hope, Magdalene Ng, Kirk Luther and David Walsh. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Psychology and Law, Psychology Crime and Law, The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles, Journal of Criminal Psychology and Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact