Ged Williams

61 papers receiving 506 citations

Peers

Ged Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Research and Theory 28
  • Emergency Medicine 93
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 40
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 42
  • Emergency Medical Services 50
Replace A. Warden with:
A. Warden United Kingdom
Patricia Folcarelli United States
Deirdre K. Thornlow United States
Deena Kelly Costa United States
Christine Leo Swenne Sweden
Wendy M. Woith United States
Heather Brom United States
Sondra Vazirani United States
Kevin D. Masick United States
Mónica Vázquez‐Calatayud Spain
Ged Williams relative to A. Warden United Kingdom A. Warden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
A. Warden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ged Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ged Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ged Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ged Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ged Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ged Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ged Williams. The network helps show where Ged Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ged Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ged Williams Line = papers co-authored together Ged Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201748
2 201047
3 201140
4 201532
5 199726
6 201125
7 200625
8 201022
9 198422
10 200117
11 202216
12 200115
13 202212
14 201912
15 200011
16 201311
17 201510
18 202010
19 20029
20 20078

About Ged Williams

Ged Williams is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medicine, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 66 papers that have together received 541 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (10 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (8 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (5 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (4 papers), Disaster Response and Management (4 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (4 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (28 citations), Emergency Medicine (93 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (40 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (42 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (50 citations). Ged Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Laura Alberto, Ruth Kleinpell, Shelley Schmollgruber, Wendy Chaboyer, Paul Fulbrook, Elizabeth Papathanassoglou, Julia Crilly, Julie Benbenishty, Samuel A. Tisherman and Kathleen Hegadoren. Their work appears in journals such as International Nursing Review, Australian Critical Care, Critical Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine Australasia and Journal of Nursing Scholarship.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact