Frederick W. Parrish

2.9k citations
64 papers · 2.3k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick W. Parrish

64 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Frederick W. Parrish
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Biotechnology 645
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 583
  • Organic Chemistry 586
  • Molecular Biology 989
  • Plant Science 541
Replace E. J. Bourne with:
E. J. Bourne United Kingdom
Manuel Bernabé Spain
Laurens Anderson United States
Konrad Lerch Switzerland
Yuhei Morita Japan
A. G. Appu Rao India
Kunitoshi Yoshihira Japan
David H. G. Crout United Kingdom
Corrado Tringali Italy
Hans Grisebach Germany
Frederick W. Parrish relative to E. J. Bourne United Kingdom E. J. Bourne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
E. J. Bourne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick W. Parrish

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick W. Parrish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick W. Parrish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick W. Parrish more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick W. Parrish

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick W. Parrish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick W. Parrish. The network helps show where Frederick W. Parrish may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick W. Parrish, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick W. Parrish Line = papers co-authored together Frederick W. Parrish links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1962291
2 1979283
3 1960181
4 1971156
5 1968105
6 196891
7 196683
8 197766
9 196764
10 198558
11 197757
12 196955
13 198051
14 196246
15 196943
16 197341
17 196740
18 198038
19 198233
20 197330

About Frederick W. Parrish

Frederick W. Parrish is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Organic Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, having authored 64 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (15 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (14 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (13 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (8 papers), Food Quality and Safety Studies (7 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (6 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (5 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (645 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (583 citations), Organic Chemistry (586 citations), Molecular Biology (989 citations) and Plant Science (541 citations). Frederick W. Parrish has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Elwyn T. Reese, Michael E. Evans, Mary Mandels, Philip E. Pfeffer, Kathleen M. Valentine, Arthur S. Perlin, Martin G. Ettlinger, Anne Maguire, Louis Long and D. H. Ball. Their work appears in journals such as Carbohydrate Research, Journal of Food Science, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Journal of Bacteriology and Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact