Frederick W. Parrish

2.9k citations
65 papers · 2.6k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick W. Parrish

65 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Frederick W. Parrish
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Biotechnology 717
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 678
  • Organic Chemistry 655
  • Molecular Biology 1.1k
  • Plant Science 614
Replace E. J. Bourne with:
E. J. Bourne United Kingdom
Laurens Anderson United States
Álvaro Sánchez‐Ferrer Spain
Manuel Bernabé Spain
T. Galliard United Kingdom
F. Payan France
David H. G. Crout United Kingdom
Yuhei Morita Japan
Corrado Tringali Italy
A. G. Appu Rao India
Frederick W. Parrish relative to E. J. Bourne United Kingdom E. J. Bourne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
E. J. Bourne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick W. Parrish

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick W. Parrish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick W. Parrish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick W. Parrish more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick W. Parrish

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick W. Parrish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick W. Parrish. The network helps show where Frederick W. Parrish may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick W. Parrish, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick W. Parrish Line = papers co-authored together Frederick W. Parrish links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1962321
2 1979302
3 1960204
4 1971175
5 1968123
6 1968103
7 196687
8 196773
9 197770
10 197768
11 198068
12 196964
13 198558
14 196955
15 196251
16 196745
17 198044
18 197344
19 197339
20 198238

About Frederick W. Parrish

Frederick W. Parrish is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Organic Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, having authored 65 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (15 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (14 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (14 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (8 papers), Food Quality and Safety Studies (7 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (6 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (5 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (717 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (678 citations), Organic Chemistry (655 citations), Molecular Biology (1.1k citations) and Plant Science (614 citations). Frederick W. Parrish has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Elwyn T. Reese, Michael E. Evans, Mary Mandels, Philip E. Pfeffer, Kathleen M. Valentine, Arthur S. Perlin, Martin G. Ettlinger, Anne Maguire, Louis Long and D. H. Ball. Their work appears in journals such as Carbohydrate Research, Journal of Food Science, Journal of Bacteriology, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Canadian Journal of Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact