Thomas D. Simpson

734 citations
30 papers · 553 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas D. Simpson

29 papers receiving 494 citations

Peers

Thomas D. Simpson
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Food Science 158
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 68
  • Biochemistry 43
  • Toxicology 18
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 41
Replace John Almy with:
John Almy United States
Frédéric Fotiadu France
Katsura Morita Japan
Sven-Olof Almqvist
Arne J. Aasen Norway
Stuart G. Collins Ireland
Dieter Bergenthal Germany
R.A. Finnegan United States
Masako Honda Japan
Shu Hai Zhao Norway
Thomas D. Simpson relative to John Almy United States John Almy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
John Almy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas D. Simpson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas D. Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas D. Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas D. Simpson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas D. Simpson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas D. Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas D. Simpson. The network helps show where Thomas D. Simpson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Thomas D. Simpson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas D. Simpson Line = papers co-authored together Thomas D. Simpson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196966
2 197755
3 198247
4 197945
5 199539
6 198233
7 200533
8 197230
9 198423
10
The redefined monetary aggregates
198017
11 198317
12 196717
13 197016
14 198916
15 197714
16 199613
17 199313
18 199312
19 19799
20 19848

About Thomas D. Simpson

Thomas D. Simpson is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Food Science, Materials Chemistry and Biochemistry, having authored 30 papers that have together received 553 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis (4 papers), Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis (3 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (3 papers), Biopolymer Synthesis and Applications (3 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (3 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (2 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (2 papers) and Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (158 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (68 citations), Biochemistry (43 citations), Toxicology (18 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (41 citations). Thomas D. Simpson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Harold W. Gardner, J. W. Hagemann, N. C. Baenziger, Robert E. Buckles, Eileen Mauskopf, Richard D. Porter, Frederick W. Parrish, Alan S. Blinder, H. J. Dutton and Mary L. Nelson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, The Journal of Finance, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Biopolymers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact