Frederick R. Prete

754 citations
30 papers · 526 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick R. Prete

30 papers receiving 505 citations

Peers

Frederick R. Prete
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 339
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 223
  • Genetics 252
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 28
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 69
Replace Anna Stöckl with:
Anna Stöckl Germany
James J. Foster Sweden
Jochen Smolka Sweden
Eberhard Horn Germany
Michael Hörner Germany
Lana Khaldy Sweden
R�diger Wehner Switzerland
Pauline N. Fleischmann Germany
Virginie Durier France
Masamichi Kanou Japan
Frederick R. Prete relative to Anna Stöckl Germany Anna Stöckl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Anna Stöckl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick R. Prete

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick R. Prete's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick R. Prete with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick R. Prete more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick R. Prete

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick R. Prete. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick R. Prete. The network helps show where Frederick R. Prete may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Frederick R. Prete, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick R. Prete Line = papers co-authored together Frederick R. Prete links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998103
2 200438
3 199333
4 199230
5 201126
6 200225
7 201325
8 200822
9 199122
10 200819
11 200818
12 199918
13 199317
14 201215
15 200815
16 199015
17 201211
18 199011
19 200810
20 20088

About Frederick R. Prete

Frederick R. Prete is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Insect Science and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 30 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (15 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (14 papers), Fossil Insects in Amber (12 papers), Plant and animal studies (10 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (5 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (4 papers), Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies (3 papers) and Insect Utilization and Effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (339 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (223 citations), Genetics (252 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (28 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (69 citations). Frederick R. Prete has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Michael H. Dickinson, Lawrence E. Hurd, Salina Dominguez, Gavin J. Svenson, Sebastian P. Grossman, Donn K. Branstrator, Tappey H. Jones, William H. Obermeyer, Allan Rechtschaffen and Michael A. Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Insect Physiology, Journal of Experimental Biology, Visual Neuroscience, Journal of the History of Biology and The Journal of Comparative Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact