Anna Stöckl

28 papers receiving 565 citations

Peers

Anna Stöckl
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 312
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 310
  • Genetics 189
  • Insect Science 63
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 78
Replace James Jonathan Foster with:
James Jonathan Foster Germany
Gavin J. Taylor Sweden
Jamie Carroll Theobald United States
Miriam J. Henze Sweden
Cole Gilbert United States
Paul S. Shamble United States
Axel Schmid Austria
Gabriel A. Miller United States
Jochen Smolka Sweden
Timothy L. Warren United States
Anna Stöckl relative to James Jonathan Foster Germany James Jonathan Foster's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
James Jonathan Foster · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Stöckl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Stöckl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Stöckl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Stöckl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Stöckl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Stöckl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Stöckl. The network helps show where Anna Stöckl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Stöckl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Stöckl Line = papers co-authored together Anna Stöckl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201678
2 201678
3 201556
4 201944
5 201735
6 201830
7 202028
8 201724
9 202023
10 202415
11 202115
12 201715
13 201415
14 201513
15 202313
16 202213
17 201913
18 202111
19 202311
20 201110

About Anna Stöckl

Anna Stöckl is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics and Ecology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 571 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (18 papers), Plant and animal studies (7 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (7 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (7 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (312 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (310 citations), Genetics (189 citations), Insect Science (63 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (78 citations). Anna Stöckl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eric J. Warrant, Almut Kelber, David C. O’Carroll, Stanley Heinze, Willi A. Ribi, James Jonathan Foster, Basil el Jundi, Keram Pfeiffer, Simon Sponberg and S. Chandler. Their work appears in journals such as Current Biology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Experimental Biology, Journal of Comparative Physiology A and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact