Anna Stöckl

22 papers receiving 484 citations

Peers

Anna Stöckl
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 280
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 293
  • Genetics 175
  • Insect Science 62
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 68
Replace James J. Foster with:
James J. Foster Sweden
Miriam J. Henze Sweden
Gabriel A. Miller United States
Frederick R. Prete United States
Jamie C. Theobald United States
Jochen Smolka Sweden
Gregory P. Sutton United Kingdom
Virginie Durier France
Primož Pirih Slovenia
Martin Y. Peek United States
Anna Stöckl relative to James J. Foster Sweden James J. Foster's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
James J. Foster · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Stöckl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Stöckl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Stöckl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Stöckl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Stöckl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Stöckl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Stöckl. The network helps show where Anna Stöckl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Stöckl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Stöckl Line = papers co-authored together Anna Stöckl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201676
2 201672
3 201553
4 201942
5 201735
6 201723
7 201823
8 202022
9 202021
10 202114
11 201714
12 201513
13 201413
14 201912
15 202310
16 20219
17 20249
18 20229
19 20117
20 20225

About Anna Stöckl

Anna Stöckl is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics and Ecology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 488 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (15 papers), Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (8 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (5 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (3 papers), Impact of Light on Environment and Health (2 papers) and Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (280 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (293 citations), Genetics (175 citations), Insect Science (62 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (68 citations). Anna Stöckl has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eric J. Warrant, Almut Kelber, David C. O’Carroll, Stanley Heinze, Willi A. Ribi, Basil el Jundi, James J. Foster, Simon Sponberg, S. Chandler and Keram Pfeiffer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Biology, Current Biology, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Journal of Comparative Physiology A and Integrative and Comparative Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact