Frederick J. Todd

737 citations
11 papers · 527 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick J. Todd

9 papers receiving 445 citations

Peers

Frederick J. Todd
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • General Decision Sciences 145
  • Family Practice 34
  • Applied Psychology 54
  • Management Science and Operations Research 110
  • Computational Mathematics 5
Replace Nancy Wiggins with:
Nancy Wiggins United States
Jack Sawyer United States
Raymond F. Sletto
Rebecca M. Pliske United States
Michael E. Doherty United States
Amber Sprenger United States
Sarah Furlan Italy
Dan Lehman United States
Benjamin M. Rottman United States
Douglas R. Glasnapp United States
Frederick J. Todd relative to Nancy Wiggins United States Nancy Wiggins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Nancy Wiggins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick J. Todd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick J. Todd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick J. Todd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick J. Todd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick J. Todd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick J. Todd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick J. Todd. The network helps show where Frederick J. Todd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Frederick J. Todd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick J. Todd Line = papers co-authored together Frederick J. Todd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1964284
2 196578
3 196639
4 196637
5 197227
6 196425
7 196215
8 197011
9 196610
10 19521
11
Social Work with the Mentally Subnormal
19670

About Frederick J. Todd

Frederick J. Todd is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability, Molecular Biology and Family Practice, having authored 11 papers that have together received 527 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive and psychological constructs research (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (1 paper), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (1 paper), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (1 paper) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (145 citations), Family Practice (34 citations), Applied Psychology (54 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (110 citations) and Computational Mathematics (5 citations). Frederick J. Todd has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth R. Hammond, Carolyn J. Hursch, Robert J. Kelley, Glenn Terrell and Harold H. Mosak. Their work appears in journals such as Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Psychological Bulletin, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Psychological Review and Journal of Applied Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact