Frédéric Schorsch
Impact in
- Small Animals top 10%
- Animal testing and alternatives
Papers in
-
- Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment 11
- Immunology 10
- Immunotoxicology and immune responses 10
- Co-authors
- David Rouquié (8 shared papers)H. Tinwell (7 shared papers)R. Bars (7 shared papers)David R. Geter (2 shared papers)Olivier Blanck (5 shared papers)Marc Pallardy (3 shared papers)Wolfgang Kaufmann (2 shared papers)Edgar Weber (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Toxicologic Pathology (7 papers)Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology (6 papers)Toxicological Sciences (2 papers)Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (2 papers)Toxicology Letters (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Frédéric Schorsch
24 papers receiving 277 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Chemical Health and Safety 5
- Small Animals 47
- Pharmacology 41
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 64
- Cancer Research 61
Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Schorsch
This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Schorsch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Schorsch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Schorsch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Schorsch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Schorsch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Schorsch. The network helps show where Frédéric Schorsch may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Schorsch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 35 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 34 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 3 |
About Frédéric Schorsch
Frédéric Schorsch is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Immunology, Small Animals, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Pharmacology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (11 papers), Immunotoxicology and immune responses (10 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (8 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (5 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (5 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (5 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers) and Ovarian function and disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Chemical Health and Safety (5 citations), Small Animals (47 citations), Pharmacology (41 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (64 citations) and Cancer Research (61 citations). Frédéric Schorsch has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Rouquié, H. Tinwell, R. Bars, David R. Geter, Olivier Blanck, Marc Pallardy, Wolfgang Kaufmann, Edgar Weber, Thomas Nolte and Anna-Lena Frisk. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicologic Pathology, Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology, Toxicological Sciences, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology and Toxicology Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.