Fredéric Sannier

41 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Fredéric Sannier
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Aquatic Science 177
  • Animal Science and Zoology 126
  • Molecular Biology 761
  • Food Science 199
  • Insect Science 122
Replace Stéphanie Bordenave-Juchereau with:
Stéphanie Bordenave-Juchereau France
Kozo Ohtsuki Japan
Le‐Chang Sun China
Yanchao Wang China
Ling‐Jing Zhang China
Hiroki Saeki Japan
Pengbo Cui China
Zhaohui Zhang China
Ronge Xing China
Fredéric Sannier relative to Stéphanie Bordenave-Juchereau France Stéphanie Bordenave-Juchereau's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Stéphanie Bordenave-Juchereau · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fredéric Sannier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fredéric Sannier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fredéric Sannier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fredéric Sannier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fredéric Sannier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fredéric Sannier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fredéric Sannier. The network helps show where Fredéric Sannier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fredéric Sannier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fredéric Sannier Line = papers co-authored together Fredéric Sannier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006171
2 199778
3 199450
4 201345
5 199642
6 200237
7 199634
8 201333
9 200932
10 199532
11 201732
12 199630
13 201729
14 200225
15 201125
16 201124
17 200522
18 201521
19 200020
20 199520

About Fredéric Sannier

Fredéric Sannier is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology, Food Science, Cell Biology and Aquatic Science, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (24 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (10 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (9 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (6 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (6 papers), Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (4 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (4 papers) and Insect Utilization and Effects (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (177 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (126 citations), Molecular Biology (761 citations), Food Science (199 citations) and Insect Science (122 citations). Fredéric Sannier has collaborated with scholars based in France, Spain and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Jean‐Marie Piot, Stéphanie Bordenave-Juchereau, Isabelle Garreau, Ingrid Fruitier‐Arnaudin, Sandrine Didelot, Thierry Maugard, Qing Zhao, Nicolas Bridiau, Qiuyu Zhao and Fabienne Guérard. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Dairy Research, Carbohydrate Polymers, Process Biochemistry, International Dairy Journal and Biochimie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact