Frédéric Joassin

1.6k citations
28 papers · 1.3k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Frédéric Joassin

28 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Frédéric Joassin
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 460
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 652
  • Sensory Systems 93
  • Applied Psychology 43
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 110
Replace Niklas Ihssen with:
Niklas Ihssen United Kingdom
Pilar Andrés Spain
Bernhard Pastötter Germany
Jason Tipples United Kingdom
Signe Vangkilde Denmark
Armin Heinecke Netherlands
Jonathan R. Folstein United States
P. Bussfeld Germany
Katja Werheid Germany
Michael Ewbank United Kingdom
Frédéric Joassin relative to Niklas Ihssen United Kingdom Niklas Ihssen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Niklas Ihssen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Joassin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Joassin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Joassin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Joassin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Joassin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Joassin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Joassin. The network helps show where Frédéric Joassin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Joassin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Joassin Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Joassin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011124
2 2004104
3 201199
4 200990
5 201086
6 201186
7 201284
8 201282
9 201181
10 200471
11 201360
12 201055
13 200740
14 200738
15 201038
16 201238
17 200128
18 201327
19 200919
20 200318

About Frédéric Joassin

Frédéric Joassin is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (12 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (10 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (3 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (460 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (652 citations), Sensory Systems (93 citations), Applied Psychology (43 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (110 citations). Frédéric Joassin has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Pierre Maurage, Salvatore Campanella, Pierre Philippot, Mauro Pesenti, Raymond Bruyer, Philippe de Timary, Olivier Luminet, Mandy Rossignol, Marc Crommelinck and Xavier Noël. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Clinical Neurophysiology, Visual Cognition, Cortex and Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact