Frédéric Barbot

33 papers receiving 483 citations

Peers

Frédéric Barbot
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Urology 120
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 64
  • Biological Psychiatry 21
  • Rheumatology 114
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 88
Replace Isabelle Vaugier with:
Isabelle Vaugier France
S. Ghroubi Tunisia
Iván Chulvi‐Medrano Spain
Laurel Riske Canada
Sylvia Dickson United Kingdom
Timothy McAlindon United States
Kazuhiro Hayashi Japan
Richard C. Niemtzow United States
Kerri Melehan Australia
Ingrid Hoeritzauer United Kingdom
Frédéric Barbot relative to Isabelle Vaugier France Isabelle Vaugier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21×
Isabelle Vaugier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Barbot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Barbot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Barbot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Barbot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Barbot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Barbot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Barbot. The network helps show where Frédéric Barbot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Barbot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Barbot Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Barbot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011120
2 201172
3 201938
4 201328
5 201620
6 201120
7 201617
8 201017
9 201916
10 201115
11 201314
12 202012
13 202112
14 201311
15 202110
16 201910
17 20209
18 20107
19 20217
20 20235

About Frédéric Barbot

Frédéric Barbot is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Rehabilitation, having authored 35 papers that have together received 502 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 papers), Sleep and related disorders (4 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (4 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (3 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (3 papers) and Nosocomial Infections in ICU (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (120 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (64 citations), Biological Psychiatry (21 citations), Rheumatology (114 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (88 citations). Frédéric Barbot has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Hartley, Frédéric Lofaso, Isabelle Vaugier, Jean‐Claude Alvarez, P. Denys, Emmanuel Chartier‐Kastler, Christian Guilleminault, M. A. Quera Salva, Jean‐François Hermieu and L. Le Normand. Their work appears in journals such as Sleep Medicine, European Respiratory Journal, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents and Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact