Fred Rush
Impact in
- Philosophy top 5%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History
Papers in
-
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 2
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 2
- Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence 1
-
- Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy 2
- Co-authors
- Alexander Nehamas (1 shared paper)A. Eshraghi (1 shared paper)Otto Schmid (1 shared paper)Vito Giannini (1 shared paper)Hong Kim (1 shared paper)Joel Whitebook (1 shared paper)Michael A. Rosen (1 shared paper)Raymond Geuss (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism (4 papers)Inquiry (2 papers)The Journal of Philosophy (2 papers)The German Quarterly (1 paper)The Philosophical Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Fred Rush
15 papers receiving 160 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Philosophy 58
- History and Philosophy of Science 17
- Aerospace Engineering 46
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 17
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 6
Countries citing papers authored by Fred Rush
This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Rush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Rush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Rush more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Rush
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Rush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Rush. The network helps show where Fred Rush may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Fred Rush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 76 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 34 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 15 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 9 | |
| 6 | On architecture | 2008 | 5 |
| 7 | Reason and Regulation in Kant | 2000 | 4 |
| 8 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 0 |
About Fred Rush
Fred Rush is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Religious studies and History, having authored 21 papers that have together received 180 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (2 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers), Religion, Theology, and Education (1 paper), Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence (1 paper), Visual Culture and Art Theory (1 paper) and Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (58 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (17 citations), Aerospace Engineering (46 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (17 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (6 citations). Fred Rush has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Nehamas, A. Eshraghi, Otto Schmid, Vito Giannini, Hong Kim, Joel Whitebook, Michael A. Rosen, Raymond Geuss, Kenneth Baynes and Joseph Bernstein. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Inquiry, The Journal of Philosophy, The German Quarterly and The Philosophical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.