Benjamin D. Crowe
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
- Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History
Papers in
- Philosophy 31
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 11
- Karl Barth and Christian Theology 6
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 6
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 6
- Study and Philosophy of Religion 5
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 5
- Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations 4
- Philosophy and Historical Thought 4
Benjamin D. Crowe
27 papers receiving 111 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Philosophy 143
- History and Philosophy of Science 29
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 63
- Religious studies 19
- Language and Linguistics 15
Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin D. Crowe
This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin D. Crowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin D. Crowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin D. Crowe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin D. Crowe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin D. Crowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin D. Crowe. The network helps show where Benjamin D. Crowe may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heidegger's Phenomenology of Religion: Realism and Cultural Criticism | 2007 | 45 |
| 2 | Heidegger's Religious Origins: Destruction and Authenticity | 2006 | 37 |
| 3 | 2005 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 2 |
About Benjamin D. Crowe
Benjamin D. Crowe is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 36 papers that have together received 194 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (11 papers), Karl Barth and Christian Theology (6 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (6 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (6 papers), Study and Philosophy of Religion (5 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (5 papers), Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations (4 papers) and Philosophy and Historical Thought (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (143 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (29 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (63 citations), Religious studies (19 citations) and Language and Linguistics (15 citations). Benjamin D. Crowe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and Canada. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Journal of the History of Ideas, Religious Studies, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie and Inquiry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.