Fred Danner

40 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Fred Danner
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 377
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 342
  • Social Psychology 429
  • Applied Psychology 65
  • Health 98
Replace Jeffrey R. Stowell with:
Jeffrey R. Stowell United States
Shirley Fisher United Kingdom
Jeff Kiesner Italy
Helen Lewis United Kingdom
Sujin Yang South Korea
Changiz Mohiyeddini United States
Bernard Boulerice Canada
Yvonne Brackbill United States
Daniel Rodriguez United States
Lisa J. Knoll United Kingdom
Fred Danner relative to Jeffrey R. Stowell United States Jeffrey R. Stowell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Jeffrey R. Stowell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fred Danner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Danner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Danner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Danner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Danner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Danner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Danner. The network helps show where Fred Danner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fred Danner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fred Danner Line = papers co-authored together Fred Danner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008145
2
Adolescent sleep, school start times, and teen motor vehicle crashes.
2008139
3 2005136
4 2014129
5 1981107
6 200790
7 199086
8 197672
9 200865
10 200957
11 201156
12 197250
13 197246
14 198745
15 197745
16 199638
17 201035
18 197635
19
Achievement Goals and Academic Cheating
200834
20 197332

About Fred Danner

Fred Danner is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (7 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (6 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (4 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (3 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (377 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (342 citations), Social Psychology (429 citations), Applied Psychology (65 citations) and Health (98 citations). Fred Danner has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Phillips, Sharon S. Rostosky, Ellen D. B. Riggle, Edward Lonky, Carole Peterson, Ruth R. Staten, John H. Flavell, Mary Carol Day, Kim Miller and Melody Noland. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Journal of Educational Psychology, Journal of Homosexuality, Journal of Adolescent Health and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact