Protein Engineering Design and Selection

145.5k citations
3.4k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Protein Structure and Dynamics
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
    • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
    • Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
    • Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
    • Protein purification and stability

Papers in

    • Enzyme Production and Characterization 232
    • Protein Structure and Dynamics 830
    • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 458
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 431
    • Protein purification and stability 277

Protein Engineering Design and Selection

3.4k papers receiving 140.9k citations

Peers

Protein Engineering Design and Selection
Comparison fields: 5 of 216
  • Molecular Biology 109.9k
  • Biotechnology 12.4k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 21.7k
  • Immunology 11.6k
  • Materials Chemistry 23.1k
Replace ChemBioChem with:
ChemBioChem United States
Pharmaceutical Research United States
Current Opinion in Biotechnology United States
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology United States
Molecular Pharmaceutics United States
Biopolymers United States
ACS Chemical Biology United States
Current Medicinal Chemistry Italy
Current Opinion in Structural Biology United States
Electrophoresis United States
Protein Engineering Design and Selection relative to ChemBioChem United States ChemBioChem's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
ChemBioChem · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Protein Engineering Design and Selection

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Protein Engineering Design and Selection. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Protein Engineering Design and Selection with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Protein Engineering Design and Selection more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Protein Engineering Design and Selection

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Protein Engineering Design and Selection. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Protein Engineering Design and Selection.

About Protein Engineering Design and Selection

The 3.4k papers published in Protein Engineering Design and Selection in the last decades have received a total of 145.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Protein Engineering Design and Selection usually cover Biotechnology (362 papers), Molecular Biology (2.7k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (699 papers), Materials Chemistry (724 papers) and Biochemistry (110 papers) specifically the topics of Protein Structure and Dynamics (830 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (704 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (695 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (458 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (431 papers), Protein purification and stability (277 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (232 papers) and Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (200 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Protein Engineering Design and Selection are Gunnar von Heijne, Janet M. Thornton, Søren Brunak, Roman A. Laskowski, Andrew C. Wallace, Henrik Nielsen, Burkhard Rost, Jacob Engelbrecht, Geoffrey J. Barton and Philip E. Bourne.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact