Protein Engineering Design and Selection

154.5k citations
3.4k papers · · active since 1986

Impact in

    • Protein Structure and Dynamics
    • Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
    • Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
    • Protein purification and stability
    • Enzyme Production and Characterization

Papers in

    • Protein Structure and Dynamics 1.5k
    • Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization 434
    • Protein purification and stability 226
    • Biochemical and Structural Characterization 160
    • Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 99
    • Enzyme Production and Characterization 210

Protein Engineering Design and Selection

3.4k papers receiving 147.6k citations

Peers

Protein Engineering Design and Selection
Comparison fields: 5 of 208
  • Molecular Biology 91.9k
  • Biotechnology 8.4k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 14.4k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 6.1k
  • Genetics 8.2k
Replace Current Opinion in Biotechnology with:
Current Opinion in Biotechnology United States
Trends in biotechnology United States
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology United States
Current Medicinal Chemistry Italy
Current Opinion in Structural Biology United States
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry United States
ChemBioChem United States
Cancers United States
Cancer Letters United States
Methods United States
Protein Engineering Design and Selection relative to Current Opinion in Biotechnology United States Current Opinion in Biotechnology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Current Opinion in Biotechnology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Protein Engineering Design and Selection

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Protein Engineering Design and Selection. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Protein Engineering Design and Selection with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Protein Engineering Design and Selection more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Protein Engineering Design and Selection

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Protein Engineering Design and Selection. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Protein Engineering Design and Selection.

About Protein Engineering Design and Selection

The 3.4k papers published in Protein Engineering Design and Selection in the last decades have received a total of 154.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Protein Engineering Design and Selection usually cover Molecular Biology (2.5k papers), Biotechnology (216 papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (494 papers), Materials Chemistry (410 papers) and Cancer Research (88 papers) specifically the topics of Protein Structure and Dynamics (1.5k papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (487 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (434 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (405 papers), Protein purification and stability (226 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (210 papers), Biochemical and Structural Characterization (160 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (99 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Protein Engineering Design and Selection are Gunnar von HEIJNE, Janet M. Thornton, Søren Brunak, Roman A. Laskowski, Andrew C. Wallace, Burkhard Rost, Henrik Nielsen, Jacob Engelbrecht, Geoffrey J. Barton and Ilya N. Shindyalov.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact