Forrest Koch

475 citations
16 papers · 227 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics 2
    • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks 2
    • Gene expression and cancer classification 2
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 4

Forrest Koch

16 papers receiving 227 citations

Peers

Forrest Koch
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 105
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 50
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 54
  • Neurology 18
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 42
Replace Rowena Chin with:
Rowena Chin Singapore
M Clare O'Donoghue United Kingdom
Lauren Mak Canada
Leon Qi Rong Ooi Singapore
Michel R.T. Sinke Netherlands
A. Leroy France
Joanna L. Hutchison United States
Bradford Dickerson United States
Xenia Kobeleva Germany
Ramona Leenings Germany
Forrest Koch relative to Rowena Chin Singapore Rowena Chin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Rowena Chin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Forrest Koch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Forrest Koch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Forrest Koch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forrest Koch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Forrest Koch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Forrest Koch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Forrest Koch. The network helps show where Forrest Koch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Forrest Koch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Forrest Koch Line = papers co-authored together Forrest Koch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 202062
2 202036
3 202123
4 202121
5 202020
6 202115
7 202112
8 20219
9 20219
10 20246
11 20224
12 20234
13 20212
14 20192
15 20221
16 20241

About Forrest Koch

Forrest Koch is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 227 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (2 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (2 papers) and Gene expression and cancer classification (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (105 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (50 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (54 citations), Neurology (18 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (42 citations). Forrest Koch has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Perminder S. Sachdev, Wei Wen, Jiyang Jiang, Anbupalam Thalamuthu, Andrew Baillie, Louise Mewton, Miriam K. Forbes, Matthew Sunderland, Lindsay M. Squeglia and Briana Lees. Their work appears in journals such as Neurobiology of Aging, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, Nucleic Acids Research, Scientific Reports and The Medical Journal of Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact