Jonathan Brett

75 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Jonathan Brett
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Toxicology 86
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 67
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 126
  • Pharmacology 131
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 87
Replace Fatemeh Yazdi with:
Fatemeh Yazdi Canada
Caroline Victorri‐Vigneau France
Emily A. Karanges Australia
Benjamin H. Han United States
Jean‐Pascal Fournier France
Marcel J. Casavant United States
Jeanette M. Tetrault United States
Marcus A. Bachhuber United States
Erin L. Winstanley United States
Dolors Capellà Spain
Jonathan Brett relative to Fatemeh Yazdi Canada Fatemeh Yazdi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Fatemeh Yazdi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Brett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Brett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Brett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Brett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Brett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Brett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Brett. The network helps show where Jonathan Brett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Brett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Brett Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Brett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015160
2 201861
3 202059
4 201756
5 201741
6 201736
7 201835
8 201435
9 201834
10 201533
11 202032
12 201829
13 202028
14 202027
15 202124
16 201922
17 201721
18 201521
19 201621
20 202119

About Jonathan Brett

Jonathan Brett is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Toxicology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 86 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (9 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (9 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (5 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (5 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (5 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (5 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (5 papers) and Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (86 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (67 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (126 citations), Pharmacology (131 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (87 citations). Jonathan Brett has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Bridin Murnion, Sallie‐Anne Pearson, Nicholas A. Buckley, Benjamin Daniels, Adam G. Elshaug, Richard O. Day, Tim Badgery‐Parker, Kelsey Chalmers, Jane E. Carland and Emily A. Karanges. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Drug and Alcohol Review, Clinical Toxicology, Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research and The Medical Journal of Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact