Floyd E. Hovis

1.5k citations
66 papers · 1.1k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Floyd E. Hovis

64 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Floyd E. Hovis
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Atmospheric Science 428
  • Global and Planetary Change 452
  • Spectroscopy 254
  • Instrumentation 53
  • Ophthalmology 71
Replace Dennis K. Killinger with:
Dennis K. Killinger United States
Patrick Rairoux France
Upendra N. Singh United States
Mulugeta Petros United States
V. E. Derr United States
Darrell E. Burch United States
R. L. Schwiesow United States
Toshikazu Itabe Japan
Jirong Yu United States
Oliver Lux Germany
Floyd E. Hovis relative to Dennis K. Killinger United States Dennis K. Killinger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Dennis K. Killinger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Floyd E. Hovis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Floyd E. Hovis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Floyd E. Hovis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Floyd E. Hovis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Floyd E. Hovis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Floyd E. Hovis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Floyd E. Hovis. The network helps show where Floyd E. Hovis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Floyd E. Hovis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Floyd E. Hovis Line = papers co-authored together Floyd E. Hovis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008384
2 1977115
3 199349
4 198045
5 197839
6 198131
7 199125
8 198424
9 199424
10 198124
11 199524
12 200624
13 198722
14 200817
15 201315
16 198814
17 202013
18 201513
19 201313
20 200413

About Floyd E. Hovis

Floyd E. Hovis is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Spectroscopy, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser Design and Applications (30 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (20 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (16 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (12 papers), Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (11 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (10 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (9 papers) and Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (428 citations), Global and Planetary Change (452 citations), Spectroscopy (254 citations), Instrumentation (53 citations) and Ophthalmology (71 citations). Floyd E. Hovis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include C. Bradley Moore, Johnathan W. Hair, C. A. Hostetler, Anthony L. Cook, R. A. Ferrare, David B. Harper, Terry L. Mack, Wayne Welch, J. D. Kelley and Peter Hess. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Chemical Physics Letters, Journal of Applied Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry and Microelectronic Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact