F.J. Arcelus

103 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

F.J. Arcelus
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Management Information Systems 983
  • Strategy and Management 974
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 491
  • Marketing 396
  • Management Science and Operations Research 496
Replace Roger W. Schmenner with:
Roger W. Schmenner United States
Ari‐Pekka Hameri Switzerland
Ronan McIvor United Kingdom
Emilio Esposito Italy
Robert H. Hayes United States
Matteo Giacomo Maria Kalchschmidt Italy
Patrizia Garengo Italy
Alan Harrison United Kingdom
Leonardo Ensslin Brazil
Guido Nassimbeni Italy
F.J. Arcelus relative to Roger W. Schmenner United States Roger W. Schmenner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Roger W. Schmenner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F.J. Arcelus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F.J. Arcelus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F.J. Arcelus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F.J. Arcelus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F.J. Arcelus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F.J. Arcelus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F.J. Arcelus. The network helps show where F.J. Arcelus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside F.J. Arcelus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F.J. Arcelus Line = papers co-authored together F.J. Arcelus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 105 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010280
2 1975183
3 2003141
4 1984100
5 200299
6 198785
7 200567
8 199561
9 199957
10 200157
11 199754
12 200553
13 199152
14 200052
15 199950
16 199347
17 201144
18 200642
19 198541
20 200640

About F.J. Arcelus

F.J. Arcelus is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management, Marketing, Economics and Econometrics and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 105 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Supply Chain and Inventory Management (50 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (27 papers), Sustainable Supply Chain Management (14 papers), Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (9 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (8 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (8 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (8 papers) and Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (983 citations), Strategy and Management (974 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (491 citations), Marketing (396 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (496 citations). F.J. Arcelus has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Spain and India. Frequent co-authors include G. Srinivasan, Allan H. Meltzer, Wojciech Nasierowski, Javier Faulín, Pablo Arocena, Nita H. Shah, Pradeep Banerjee, A.H.M.A. Rahim, Timo Pakkala and S.K. Goyal. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Production Economics, European Journal of Operational Research, International Transactions in Operational Research, Journal of the Operational Research Society and Omega.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact