Fiona Murphy

75 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Fiona Murphy
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Research and Theory 132
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 18
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 82
  • Leadership and Management 17
  • Clinical Psychology 249
Replace Noriko Yamamoto‐Mitani with:
Noriko Yamamoto‐Mitani Japan
Linda Edgar Canada
Gunilla Borglin Sweden
Elisabeth I. Patiraki Greece
Madeleine Estryn‐Béhar France
Maja Djukic United States
May Solveig Fagermoen Norway
Norma J. Stewart Canada
Barbara K Haas United States
Tsung‐Lan Chu Taiwan
Fiona Murphy relative to Noriko Yamamoto‐Mitani Japan Noriko Yamamoto‐Mitani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Noriko Yamamoto‐Mitani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fiona Murphy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fiona Murphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fiona Murphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fiona Murphy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fiona Murphy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fiona Murphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fiona Murphy. The network helps show where Fiona Murphy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fiona Murphy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fiona Murphy Line = papers co-authored together Fiona Murphy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980150
2 2015114
3 2008109
4 201596
5 200064
6 199863
7 201260
8 201252
9 201751
10 200947
11 200043
12 200838
13 200434
14 200534
15 201131
16 201530
17 200630
18 202030
19 200630
20 200924

About Fiona Murphy

Fiona Murphy is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Research and Theory, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers), Nursing education and management (6 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (6 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (3 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (132 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (18 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (82 citations), Leadership and Management (17 citations) and Clinical Psychology (249 citations). Fiona Murphy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include H A F Dudley, Joy A. Merrell, Paloma Sales, Sheigla Murphy, Nicholas Lau, Sue E. Jordan, Steve Jones, Alan N. Mayer, Shân Davies and Allyson Lipp. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Nurse Education in Practice, Journal of Nursing Management and Nurse Education Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact