Julia Terry

458 citations
28 papers · 317 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Terry

26 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

Julia Terry
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Research and Theory 11
  • General Health Professions 133
  • Public Administration 12
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 3
  • Clinical Psychology 54
Replace Lisa Reynolds with:
Lisa Reynolds United Kingdom
Pip Hardy United Kingdom
Linus Vanlaere Belgium
Jamie Etherington Australia
Sheila M. Epp Canada
Brian N. Phillips United States
Anya Bostian Peters United States
Jan Seerp Jukema Netherlands
Cara Osborne United States
Flora Xuhua He Australia
Julia Terry relative to Lisa Reynolds United Kingdom Lisa Reynolds's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Lisa Reynolds · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Terry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Terry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Terry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Terry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Terry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Terry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Terry. The network helps show where Julia Terry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Julia Terry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Terry Line = papers co-authored together Julia Terry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201868
2 201240
3 201530
4 201928
5 201224
6 201318
7 201018
8 201916
9
Understanding Young People's Experiences of Cybersecurity
202113
10 20118
11 20116
12 20236
13 20166
14 20095
15 20215
16 20235
17 20244
18 20243
19 20032
20 20092

About Julia Terry

Julia Terry is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Research and Theory and Social Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Impairment and Communication (8 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (4 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport (2 papers) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (11 citations), General Health Professions (133 citations), Public Administration (12 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (3 citations) and Clinical Psychology (54 citations). Julia Terry has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and India. Frequent co-authors include Sarah D. Tait, Cathy Williams, Louise Condon, Michael Coffey, Fiona Murphy, Jaynie Y. Rance, Pardeep Kumar, Madalina Jäger, Deborah H Williams and Joanne E. Davies. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education in Practice, Clinical Simulation in Nursing, Nurse Education Today, Journal of Public Health and Health Expectations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact