Fiona Moir

1.3k citations
55 papers · 803 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Fiona Moir

46 papers receiving 772 citations

Peers

Fiona Moir
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • General Health Professions 270
  • Speech and Hearing 65
  • Clinical Psychology 210
  • Social Psychology 125
  • Applied Psychology 25
Replace Veronika Ottová-Jordan with:
Veronika Ottová-Jordan Germany
V. Walburg France
Candace Currie United Kingdom
Pernilla Garmy Sweden
Flávia Lopes Gabani Brazil
Kjell Kristoffersen Norway
Trish Beuhring United States
Eva‐Carin Lindgren Sweden
Wolfgang Settertobulte Germany
Andrew J. Barnes United States
Fiona Moir relative to Veronika Ottová-Jordan Germany Veronika Ottová-Jordan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Veronika Ottová-Jordan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fiona Moir

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fiona Moir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fiona Moir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fiona Moir more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fiona Moir

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fiona Moir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fiona Moir. The network helps show where Fiona Moir may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fiona Moir, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fiona Moir Line = papers co-authored together Fiona Moir links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018162
2 202090
3 201679
4 201775
5 201961
6 201943
7 201538
8 201934
9 201225
10 201222
11 200221
12 202211
13 202310
14 202310
15 201710
16 202110
17 20219
18
Mindfulness-Based Intervention Research: Characteristics, Approaches, and Developments
20199
19 20167
20 20227

About Fiona Moir

Fiona Moir is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 55 papers that have together received 803 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (9 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (8 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), Child Therapy and Development (5 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers) and Workplace Violence and Bullying (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (270 citations), Speech and Hearing (65 citations), Clinical Psychology (210 citations), Social Psychology (125 citations) and Applied Psychology (25 citations). Fiona Moir has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Marcus A. Henning, Jill Yielder, Yan Chen, Craig S. Webster, Christian U. Krägeloh, Simon Moyes, C. Raina Elley, Craig Hassed, Andrew Molodynski and Dinesh Bhugra. Their work appears in journals such as BJGP Open, International Journal of Social Psychiatry, International Review of Psychiatry, JMIR Medical Education and Journal of Affective Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact