Bert van der Werf

1.6k citations
70 papers · 1.2k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Bert van der Werf

66 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Bert van der Werf
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 282
  • Ecological Modeling 77
  • Global and Planetary Change 278
  • Ecology 323
  • Clinical Psychology 116
Replace George A. King with:
George A. King United States
Michael Arthur Australia
Stefanie von Felten Switzerland
Hélène Cyr Canada
Elizabeth P. Flint United States
Ken Gerow United States
Amanda Little United States
Ann Peterson Australia
Charles K. Burnett United States
Tobias Roth Switzerland
Bert van der Werf relative to George A. King United States George A. King's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
George A. King · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bert van der Werf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bert van der Werf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bert van der Werf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bert van der Werf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bert van der Werf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bert van der Werf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bert van der Werf. The network helps show where Bert van der Werf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bert van der Werf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bert van der Werf Line = papers co-authored together Bert van der Werf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011131
2 2006106
3 200885
4
Model documentation for the European Forest Information Scenario model (EFISCEN 3.1.3)
200771
5 200866
6 200762
7 198949
8 201945
9 198834
10 202032
11 201831
12 199628
13 202027
14 202026
15 199126
16 202123
17 200923
18 201423
19 200920
20 200519

About Bert van der Werf

Bert van der Werf is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Transportation and Insect Science, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Forest ecology and management (6 papers), Forest Management and Policy (5 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (4 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (4 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (3 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (282 citations), Ecological Modeling (77 citations), Global and Planetary Change (278 citations), Ecology (323 citations) and Clinical Psychology (116 citations). Bert van der Werf has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Netherlands and Australia. Frequent co-authors include K. Krämer, Hermann Hötker, Maja Roodbergen, Mart‐Jan Schelhaas, Jane Alexander, Teresa Allan, Len Bowers, Eimear Muir‐Cochrane, G. Ernsting and Nelly van der Hoeven. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, JAMA Surgery, Forest Ecology and Management, Journal of Transport & Health and ANZ Journal of Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact