Fernando Mendes

2.6k citations
65 papers · 858 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Fernando Mendes

55 papers receiving 796 citations

Peers

Fernando Mendes
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • General Health Professions 208
  • Toxicology 22
  • Epidemiology 220
  • Clinical Psychology 132
  • Applied Psychology 21
Replace Najat J. Ziyadeh with:
Najat J. Ziyadeh United States
Adriana Sañudo Brazil
Goldy C. George United States
Robert T. Brodell United States
Lisa Brunton United Kingdom
Beverly Long United States
Bertha Hidalgo United States
Milica Marković Israel
Deborah Marshall United States
Monali Bhosle United States
Fernando Mendes relative to Najat J. Ziyadeh United States Najat J. Ziyadeh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Najat J. Ziyadeh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fernando Mendes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando Mendes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando Mendes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando Mendes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando Mendes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando Mendes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando Mendes. The network helps show where Fernando Mendes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fernando Mendes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fernando Mendes Line = papers co-authored together Fernando Mendes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008186
2 201347
3 200944
4 202143
5
Drugs and alcohol consumption and sexual behaviours in night recreational settings in Portugal.
200937
6 202134
7 200932
8 201631
9 201330
10
Enjoying the nightlife in Europe: the role of moderation.
200330
11 202126
12 201224
13 201220
14 201517
15 201516
16 200915
17 201015
18 202015
19 202114
20 202013

About Fernando Mendes

Fernando Mendes is a scholar working on Oncology, Clinical Psychology, Molecular Biology, General Health Professions and Immunology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 858 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (10 papers), Sex work and related issues (7 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Community Health and Development (5 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (5 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (5 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (4 papers) and Enzyme Production and Characterization (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (208 citations), Toxicology (22 citations), Epidemiology (220 citations), Clinical Psychology (132 citations) and Applied Psychology (21 citations). Fernando Mendes has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Brazil and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Amador Calafat, Montse Juan, Diana Martins, Mark A Bellis, Karen Hughes, João Apóstolo, Susanne Schnitzer, Penelope A. Phillips‐Howard, Anna Ramon‐Aribau and Nicole Blay. Their work appears in journals such as Adicciones, Nutrients, Molecular Biology Reports, Biomedicines and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact