Fernando Cañas

29 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers

Fernando Cañas
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 281
  • Family Practice 8
  • Clinical Psychology 96
  • Biological Psychiatry 9
  • Philosophy 46
Replace Jacqueline Zummo with:
Jacqueline Zummo United States
J.L. Ayuso-Gutiérrez Spain
Elmārs Rancāns Latvia
Karl J. Gregor United States
Laura Béchard‐Evans Canada
F. Cañas Spain
Kristin A. Cassidy United States
S. Golshan United States
Carmen Barral Spain
Anthony Glasper United Kingdom
Fernando Cañas relative to Jacqueline Zummo United States Jacqueline Zummo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jacqueline Zummo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fernando Cañas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando Cañas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando Cañas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando Cañas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando Cañas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando Cañas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando Cañas. The network helps show where Fernando Cañas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fernando Cañas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fernando Cañas Line = papers co-authored together Fernando Cañas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201339
2 201337
3 200737
4 200333
5 201831
6 200430
7 201027
8 201620
9 201019
10 201319
11 201419
12 201417
13 200216
14 201115
15 201514
16 201014
17 201913
18 201713
19 201112
20 201211

About Fernando Cañas

Fernando Cañas is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology and Surgery, having authored 29 papers that have together received 500 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (21 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (5 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers), Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis (2 papers) and Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (281 citations), Family Practice (8 citations), Clinical Psychology (96 citations), Biological Psychiatry (9 citations) and Philosophy (46 citations). Fernando Cañas has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Julio Bobes, Hans‐Jürgen Möller, Miquel Bernardo, Pedro Afonso, Javier Rejas, Joan Mackell, Enric Álvarez, Miguel Gutiérrez, Sofia Brissos and Josep Gascón. Their work appears in journals such as Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, European Neuropsychopharmacology, CNS Spectrums, Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental and Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact